| Below are two case studies that
will be referred to during the teleseminar |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Study 1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Perkins Loan and Stafford Sub and Un-Sub
All of the above loans can be consolidated except the SELF-Loan that
is through the State of MN. This is a stand-alone loan and must be paid
according to the promissory note. Borrower has graduated in the field of Education with a Science/Math major. This borrower will be eligible to cancel his/her entire Federal Perkins Student Loan if he/she teaches Math and/or Science for a total of five years. This benefit is due to the shortage of teachers in these fields. I would counsel this borrower to leave the Perkins out of the consolidation because he would lose this benefit, once consolidated. I would suggest that the borrower considers consolidation of his FFEL
loans through his/her original lender (if all loans are through same lender)
or another company who is reputable and easy to work with. The monthly
payments if not consolidated will be approximately $430.00 per month for
ten years. He/she could cut this payment by close to 50% and therefore
be able to budget in order to make the payments on the SELF-loan. Keeping
in mind the salaries of a teacher, we know he/she will be counting every
penny to be able to have some discretionary income each month. It is common
for teachers to have to work during the summer months to make ends meet.
It is also generally understood that insurance is part of the benefit
package, which is a very large dollar item in today's society. If the
borrower were able to make larger payments down the road I would tell
him/her to pay the loan off more quickly, saving money on interest charges.
In this case I would also counsel the borrower to choose a "fixed"
payment plan when consolidating. Teachers know how much "take home"
pay they will receive each month. With a debt as large as this, a budget
is absolutely necessary. It is easier to budget when the payment is static. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Study 2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal Direct Subsidized and Unsubsidized Loans
The student, Mary, took four years to earn a juris doctor and a master's degree in public policy. She graduated in May 2001 and has begun a career in public interest law with a starting annual salary of $36,000. Mary needed to decide by the end of her grace period in November 2001
whether to consolidate her loans in order to take advantage of their in-school
interest rates. She used the program's interactive calculator to compare
what her monthly and total loan payments would be if she consolidated
versus if she did not consolidate and her out-of-school interest rate
were 8.25 percent without repayment incentives. Mary determined that with
the Direct Loan Program's Electronic Debit Account (.25%) repayment incentive,
her consolidated loan would have a fixed interest rate of 5.375 percent
and the monthly and total payments would compare as follows:
She decided to consolidate her loans because she needs to have her loan
payments as close to or less than 10 percent of her monthly salary, or
$300. Her initial monthly payment of $348 with the graduated repayment
option on her consolidated loan would bring her closest to that figure.
However, Mary has the benefit of her law school's Loan Repayment Assistance
Program (LRAP) that will provide her with a forgivable annual loan to
assist her with up to $55,500 of her debt load. Her position with a non-profit
public interest organization and annual salary of less than $40,000 qualify
her for assistance that will provide up to $681 per month toward her loan
payments. Thus, if she makes standard monthly payments of $696, she will
need to pay only $15 per month out of her own pocket while she begins
her public interest law career. Although the LRAP can provide assistance
for up to 10 years of student loan payments, it is unlikely that Mary
will meet the income requirement for that length of time. Thus, her monthly
payments on her consolidated loan will become more significant when she
needs to make them completely with her own financial resources. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Study 3 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal Direct Subsidized and Unsubsidized Loans
The student attended her college for 2 years and borrowed at the college's maximum level although not attaining sophomore status. She did not make Satisfactory Academic Progress and was academically withdrawn from the college. Through counseling in the financial aid office, she thought she would consolidate both Perkins and Direct Loans. In counseling her, the financial aid debt management staff learned that she - like many students in this circumstance - had also accumulated high levels of consumer debt. She not only had been trying to cover her own costs, but also attempted to help her family. The debt counseling staff looked at her payments and recommended she not consolidate the Perkins Loan because her academic advisory supported her new direction to go into teaching. She hopes to come back to the college with mentor support and teach in an urban area. She learned that consolidating the Perkins would eliminate this benefit. She also will work as a clerk during her year absence from college. Further counseling suggested that Income Contingent repayment would lower her payments. She was advised to be sure to keep current on her Perkins Loan so that she did not go into default, which would prohibit her re-entry to college if she needed financial aid. She was advised to use the lower Income Contingent repayment to speed up repayment of her consumer debt.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Study 4 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
FFELP Subsidized/Unsubsidized and Private Alternative Loans
Dillon was enrolled in a five-year program to earn an engineering degree. He graduated in May of 2001 with debt from several lenders. He had expected to begin working in September with a salary of $52,000 annually, but his job offer was rescinded after the company instituted job cuts. He took a position with temporary agency earning approximately $24,000 annually while he looked for a permanent placement. Dillon's consolidation decision was complicated by his mix of federal and alternative loans. He had to make a determination about whether to consolidate his federal and his alternative loans into one product or to have two separate consolidation loans for his federal debt and his alternative debt. But he also wanted to consider if he should delay consolidation until after he had secured a new job and had a better handle on his budget situation. He went to the web sites of several of his lenders and used their calculators to compare what he would have to pay monthly and in total if he consolidated his federal loan debt. He noted that his out-of-school interest rate would be approximately 7% without repayment incentives.
Dillon noted that with the term extension under the income sensitive model, he would end up paying more in total than under a graduated plan with two-years of interest only payments. He decided that he would sign-up for the Income Sensitive options provided
by his lenders on his federal loans for the first year and then re-consider
consolidation. Because his advisor reminded him of the excellent current
interest rate environment, Dillon is planning on re-evaluating his situation
before July of 2002 when rates will change. Dillon had the option to consolidate his private loans independently. The interest rate on several of the alternative loan consolidation products he researched were noted as Prime + 3%, although several had significant interest rate discounts of 2% for on-time payments. There were also fees of approximately 8% for most programs. However, because Dillon's undergraduate program had a customized deal with its lender, his interest rate was currently lower. And he could get an interest rate discount - although a much smaller ½% -- for paying on time without any additional fees. Dillon decided to place his private loans into the graduated repayment plan offered by his lenders and include these loans in his re-evaluation process next year.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case Study 5 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fast forward to spring 2002: Sidney is about to graduate with a degree in international business. An independent student, Sidney borrowed heavily under the Stafford program to finance her four-year degree. She also has a small amount of Perkins loans. Soon after graduation, Sidney will start a good job, which pays $38,500 a year; she plans to live in a moderate-cost area but has not yet found a roommate to share living expenses. Also, during the last two years of school, she has amassed $11,000 in credit card debt, in part to pay for an overseas travel opportunity, relocation expenses, a series of expensive auto repairs., and other expenses. Sidney has tried to manage her money wisely and knows she needs to keep her belt tightened during the next few years. She wants to pay down her credit card debt. She's trying to be more conscientious in making her monthly debt payments. She has paid several hefty late fees because she didn't make her credit card payments on time. . She also wants to enroll in an MBA program in several years' time. Option 1
Sidney should also be able to take an interest tax deduction when filing her federal income tax returns. During the first year of repayment of her consolidation loan (including the Perkins), she can expect to pay nearly $2,000 in interest, assuming all of her payments are made on time. By including her Perkins loan, she can lock a consolidation rate of 5.375 percent for 25 years. By increasing her credit card payments,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||